Swords and shields

The Economist,  Friday, February 05, 2016

Perhaps even more important, the Privacy Shield may stop the slide towards the fragmentation of cyberspace along national lines. Since its inception, the internet has struggled to stay a borderless space for ideas and commerce. Countries such as China have established what they see as sovereignty over their computers and networks, protecting themselves from threats such as “information weapons” (also known as “news”). Others are itching to follow. If America and the EU, with their shared history, interests and values, could not reach agreement over safeguarding their citizens’ data, there would be little hope for anyone else.

Email privacy legislation moving forward in House

Mario Trujillo, The Hill,  Thursday, February 04, 2016

The House Judiciary Committee will vote next month on email privacy legislation that has failed to move despite widespread support in recent years. Committee Chairman Bob Goddlatte (R-Va.) on Wednesday said the legislation is necessary to update a 1986 law to explicitly require the government to obtain a warrant when it is seeking to access emails or other electronic communications. “It’s clear that the law needs to be modernized and updated to ensure it keeps pace with ever-changing technologies so that we protect Americans’ constitutional rights and provide law enforcement with the tools they need for criminal investigations in the digital age,” he said in a statement.

More Than a Third of Americans Would Undergo Iris Scans for Better Government Services

Mohana Ravindranath, Nextgov,  Thursday, February 04, 2016

Slightly more than one-third of U.S. citizens would share their iris scans with the federal government, if it meant they could get personalized services, such as quicker processing of passports and taxes, a new survey found. A new Accenture survey reveals that 67 percent of respondents would share their cellphone numbers with the federal government, but far fewer -- 35 percent -- would proffer their iris scans in exchange for individualized services.

The massive new privacy deal between U.S. and Europe, explained

Andrea Peterson, The Washington Post,  Wednesday, February 03, 2016

The details are still emerging, but officials say the pact will include several assurances from the U.S. side...

Commentary: Surge of body-worn police video demands we adopt policies to secure data

Jeff Gould by Jeff Gould, SafeGov.org
Wednesday, February 03, 2016

Body-worn camera video needs to be protected by the strongest data standards available. The FBI’s Criminal Justice Information Service (CJIS) Security Policy, developed over many years by the FBI with extensive input from state and local law enforcement agencies, is made-to-order for the task. The CJIS Security Policy is designed to ensure that the information which flows from the FBI’s vast national database to local law enforcement agencies is protected both from outside hackers and inside leaks.

Commission, Commerce announce new EU-US data transfer agreement

Jedidiah Bracy, The Privacy Advisor / IAPP,  Tuesday, February 02, 2016

Called the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield, the new agreement "will protect the fundamental rights of Europeans when their personal data is transferred to U.S. companies,” said Commissioner Věra Jourová. “For the first time ever, the United States has given the EU binding assurances that the access of public authorities for national security purposes will be subject to clear limitations, safeguards, and oversight mechanisms.”

Safe Harbor Out--Stronger US, Corporate Obligations In

Lisa Brownlee, Forbes,  Tuesday, February 02, 2016

A new European Commission-U.S. data transfers framework deal, called Privacy Shield, has been reached. This framework is intended to replace the invalidated Safe Harbor arrangement. Privacy Shield was announced and detailed in outline form today by the EC. Provisions as outlined reveal substantial new future U.S. compliance obligations, including for U.S. corporations.

How Europe is fighting to change tech companies' 'wrecking ball' ethics

Julia Powles and Carissa Véliz, The Guardian,  Monday, February 01, 2016

Facebook, Google, Amazon and other internet behemoths are involved in a form of technological innovation that is acting as a “wrecking ball”, the president of the European parliament declared in Brussels this week. “The aim is not just to play with the way society is organised, but instead to demolish the existing order and build something new in its place,” said Martin Schulz. “The internet lost its innocence long ago.”

How Europe Protects Your Online Data Differently Than the U.S.

Mark Scott and Natash Singer, New York Times,  Monday, February 01, 2016

Your digital footprint can quickly extend far and wide and be used in multiple ways. Your interactions on Facebook shape the ads you see there. The kinds of films and music you stream may allow online companies to make inferences about your political leanings or religious beliefs. And your health insurer may analyze details about your online shopping habits. How much control do you have over how companies collect and use your information? And what mechanisms are in place to protect your data against misuse?

Ubiquitous Cameras Lead to Ubiquitous Video: What’s the Storage Solution?

Margaret Steen, Emergency Management,  Monday, February 01, 2016

The use of cloud technology as a storage solution was initially not on the radar for police departments because most cloud computing platforms didn’t meet the FBI’s Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) requirements. But cloud solutions are improving, and a number of them are now CJIS-compliant.