David Meyer, Politico EU, Wednesday, November 18, 2015
Before the bloody attacks in Paris, the European Union was already in the throes of a long and passionate debate over the balance between security and privacy. As the manhunt continues and authorities race for clues, that debate is raging at every political level. The outcome will have sweeping consequences for international cooperation between law enforcement and businesses, as well as on the fundamental right to privacy and data protection.
New York Times Editorial Board, Wednesday, November 18, 2015
It’s a wretched yet predictable ritual after each new terrorist attack: Certain politicians and government officials waste no time exploiting the tragedy for their own ends. The remarks on Monday by John Brennan, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, took that to a new and disgraceful low. Speaking less than three days after coordinated terrorist attacks in Paris killed 129 and injured hundreds more, Mr. Brennan complained about “a lot of hand-wringing over the government’s role in the effort to try to uncover these terrorists.” What he calls “hand-wringing” was the sustained national outrage following the 2013 revelations by Edward Snowden...
Dan Heilman, Top Tech News, Tuesday, November 17, 2015
Nadella said that center will be a state-of-the-art facility that contains a staff of security response experts charged with detecting and responding to cyber threats in real time. It’s all part of what Nadella called Microsoft’s new approach to security: being hyper-vigilant while addressing the cybersecurity problems it and other companies routinely face, including malware, phishing attacks and accidental data Relevant Products/Services loss.
Kim Zetter, WIRED, Tuesday, November 17, 2015
There are several holes in the argument that forcing backdoors on companies will make us all more secure. While doing this would no doubt make things easier for the intelligence and law enforcement communities, it would come at a grave societal cost—and a different security cost—and still fail to solve some of the problems intelligence agencies say they have with surveillance.
Ingrid Burrington, The Atlantic, Tuesday, November 17, 2015
The things that shape data-center geography outside the U.S. aren't all that different from things that shape data-center geography in the U.S. In general, large companies building cloud infrastructure seek access to land, and appealing climates—environmental, financial, and political. Places with high concentrations of Internet exchanges, network infrastructure, U.S.-friendly governments, existing tech sectors, or highly educated populations (Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Hong Kong, Singapore) become logical locations for data centers.
Kate Tummarello and Alex Byers, POLITICO, Tuesday, November 17, 2015
EU Justice Commissioner Vera Jourová makes the rounds in Washington today, trying to sell lawmakers on an EU-focused privacy bill while continuing negotiations with Obama administration officials over the future of the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor. The House has passed the Judicial Redress Act, which would extend new legal protections to EU citizens, but Grassley’s Senate committee hasn’t even debated it.
Devlin Barrett, Wall Street Journal, Monday, November 16, 2015
The Justice Department is publicly urging local police departments to adopt body cameras, saying they are an important tool to improve transparency and trust between officers and citizens. But privately, the department (DOJ) is telling some of its agents they cannot work with officers using such cameras as part of joint task forces, according to people familiar with the discussions. The reason: The federal government hasn’t yet adopted guidelines on how and when to use body cameras, rules that would be important to determining how any footage could be used in court, released publicly, or stored by law-enforcement agencies. The contradiction reveals the potential challenges for federal agencies that work closely with local police, such as the U.S. Marshals.
Hamza Shaban, BuzzFeed, Monday, November 16, 2015
The commissioner of justice for the European Union struck an optimistic tone Monday, outlining a way forward for negotiations between the EU and the United States over consumer privacy and the future of internet commerce. During a speech at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C., Vera Jourová said a new agreement regulating the transatlantic flow of commercial data will be set by January next year. Though her remarks were conciliatory, in part to to ease the concerns of an American tech industry under increased European regulatory scrutiny, Jourová emphasized that disagreements over national security and data privacy stand as key points of contention between the two sides.
Ruth Starkman, Huffington Post, Monday, November 16, 2015
When the Bard College Debate Union and the United States Military Academy at West Point Debate Society tackled the question: "Is National Security More Important Than Individual Right To Privacy," both affirmative and negative sides delivered compelling, well-researched, and often surprising answers. This event, sponsored by the Bard Debate Union, the Hannah Arendt Center, the Center for Civic Engagement, and the Bard-West Point Exchange, marked the third annual debate of the Bard-West Point Exchange and opened The Hannah Arendt Center's two-day "Why Privacy Matters" conference on October 15-16 with a compelling presentation of student perspectives. That students should have the first word was fitting.
Tracy Mitrano, Inside Higher Ed, Monday, November 16, 2015
Standards for body worn cameras on campus law enforcement. The CJIS Security Policy is a model whether one is investing in campus policy body cam video or not. It covers the general and fine points of policy governance, technical controls, training, education and awareness. Cloud computing procurement and contracts with vendors are interwoven into its directives rather than, as is the case with so many of our higher education ventures, an initiative that gets bolted onto policy written when on premise services were the norm. Although titled a “security policy” it weaves privacy practices into it. Surprisingly devoid of government speak, the prose is clear and organized.