Stephen Dockery, Wall Street Journal, Friday, January 29, 2016
Jay Cline, a data protection and privacy leader from PwC, said that “big data is the newest privacy risk … Privacy used to be a two-dimensional risk, but that’s all changing.” The PwC experts argued that “recognizing the importance of big data and privacy means having policies to handle the creation and capture of data from start to finish” and “it also means knowing when to stop.” “Current technologies might exceed the amount of data that’s appropriate to gather,” they said.
FIDO Alliance, Thursday, January 28, 2016
Today is Data Privacy Day 2016 and, as a Champion organization, we want to join in the conversation on the importance of respecting user privacy online, and the ways FIDO authentication standards do just that. To this end, we have released today the ”FIDO Privacy White Paper,” which describes how privacy has been taken into account in the design of the FIDO protocols, and how they can help meet privacy requirements from certain regulatory authorities. To understand why FIDO authentication standards were designed with a user-privacy focus, it’s important to first understand how privacy relates to security in the context of accessing online services.
Law Office of Bradley S. Shear
Wednesday, January 27, 2016
During President Obama’s final State of the Union address earlier this month, he drew attention to the rapid pace of change brought about by technology and innovations, explaining that these changes are “reshaping the way we live, the way we work, our planet, our place in the world. … And whether we like it or not, the pace of this change will only accelerate.” The president could not be more correct. While the world has significantly changed since President Obama took office in 2009, the laws and regulations governing the technology that has driven this change have not kept pace.
Michael Maciag, GovTech.com Digital Communities, Wednesday, January 27, 2016
Another important policy decision police are grappling with is how long they’ll retain the footage. It’s a safe assumption that most departments would prefer to keep it for longer, but because of the cost of data storage, that's just not feasible, said Jeff Gould, president of SaveGov.org, an online forum of IT experts.
Kate Tummarello and Alex Byers, POLITICO, Monday, January 25, 2016
It’s now T-minus seven days until Europe's self-imposed deadline for replacing the transatlantic data-transfer agreement invalidated this fall by the European Union's highest court. The focus of the debate over the last few days has been at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland, where U.S. Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker provided her most detailed read-out yet on the U.S.'s "comprehensive offer" to Europe. It includes "seven pathways for EU citizens to address their concerns" about how U.S. companies handle their data. U.S. agencies, including the FTC, have agreed to "significant new frameworks and commitments."
Mark Scott, New York Times, Monday, January 25, 2016
One thing is clear, she says: The practices of American businesses, and tech companies in particular, are squarely in her sights. “American companies do not have an immediate right to collect data on our citizens,” Ms. Falque-Pierrotin, 56, a blunt-speaking career civil servant, said recently in an interview, her voice increasingly animated. “If they are on our soil, then they need to live with the consequences.”
John Ribeiro, PC World, Thursday, January 21, 2016
The fight for privacy is moving to U.S. states with 16 states and the District of Columbia introducing legislation on Wednesday that address issues such as requiring permission before student data is shared for non-educational purposes and the requirement of warrants before using cell site simulators to track phone users.
Bryan Betts, Computer Weekly, Wednesday, January 20, 2016
Cloud storage is hot, so we are told. It will rejuvenate your company, offload all that troublesome and expensive on-premise hardware, and help you ready staff and applications for Generation Mobile. But when we look at European organisations, we see a somewhat different – and, dare one say it, more realistic and nuanced – response to the preachings of the technology evangelists.
Andrew Orlowski, The Register, Tuesday, January 19, 2016
Europeans should sit up and take more notice of Microsoft’s lawsuit against the US government over secret access to their data. Why? Because it affects much more of their data than the Safe Harbour case, according to Microsoft president and lead counsel Brad Smith. “The Department of Justice does not need to wait for data to come to the United States to examine it,” he explained. “It can force countries to give it your data without disclosing that access to government, or complying with any European law.”
Julia Fioretti, Reuters, Tuesday, January 19, 2016
The European Union wants guarantees of effective limits on U.S. authorities' power to request people's personal information from companies to conclude a new EU-U.S. data transfer pact, a top EU official said on Monday, as a deadline from EU privacy regulators looms. Securing sufficient assurances U.S. spies will not access Europeans' personal data indiscriminately once it is transferred across the Atlantic has been a big sticking point in two years of talks between Brussels and Washington on a new framework for protecting data shifted to the United States. "We need guarantees that there is effective judicial control of public authorities' access to data for national security, law enforcement and public interest purposes," EU Justice Commissioner Vera Jourova said at a conference in Brussels.