Doug Drinkwater, SC Magazine UK, Friday, October 10, 2014
A senior Microsoft spokesman says that government surveillance has damaged trust in the cloud and in the company itself, pushing the latter to focus more on data privacy and security. The firm's principal cyber-security strategist Jeff Jones was presenting at the IP Expo Europe exhibition in London on Thursday, where he suggested that the leaks from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden had impacted the Redmond technology giant and the cloud computing market as a whole. He then suggested that that the leaks had ‘affected' cloud in the enterprise, as well as the company's own ambitions in this area, before adding that the growing distrust in the cloud had come at a time where ‘perceptual concerns' around cloud security were dissipating on deployment.
Thursday, October 09, 2014
Are privacy and security laws being enforced effectively? What kind of sanctions do privacy and security laws use for enforcement? In this post, I will discuss the various tools that are frequently used in the enforcement of privacy/security laws.
Eleanor Dallaway, Infosecurity, Thursday, October 09, 2014
I ask Lynch how attitudes to privacy have evolved during the decade he has spent in the privacy team at Microsoft. “At a fundamental level, people cared about their privacy then, as they do now,” he argues. “But the nature of technology and the data collection and use that’s occurring now is much greater, and therefore perhaps concerns and fears are now manifesting themselves in the realities of what’s happening today.” That reality, according to Lynch, is the “potential for a digital record of all human activity.” As technology intersects with people’s lives and activities, and devices become ever-more mobile, “sensors all around us” will create those digital records, he warns. Perhaps as a result of this so-called “trendline,” people are now starting to question how their information is being used, who they should trust, what control they have, and in some cases, what actions they can take to better protect their privacy. All of this whilst still taking advantage of an explosion in new productivity and connectivity capabilities.
Tuesday, October 07, 2014
How are privacy and security laws enforced? How should they be enforced? What enforcement works well? What doesn’t? What are the various agencies that are enforcing privacy laws doing? How do the agencies compare in their enforcement efforts? I plan to explore these questions in a series of posts. Collectively, I’ll call this series “Enforcing Privacy and Security Laws.”
Julian Hattem, The Hill, Tuesday, October 07, 2014
The software industry is making moves to beef up privacy protections for students. The Software and Information Industry Association (SIIA) joined with the Future of Privacy Forum, a think tank, to announce a new pledge for companies that make products for students in kindergarten through 12th grade. Under the pledge, a handful of companies have promised not to sell student information or target their ads based on students’ behavior. Companies will also only use data for specific educational purposes and will impose limits on how long that information is held.
Natasha Singer, New York Times, Tuesday, October 07, 2014
The software industry is making moves to beef up privacy protections for students.The Software and Information Industry Association (SIIA) joined with the Future of Privacy Forum, a think tank, to announce a new pledge for companies that make products for students in kindergarten through 12th grade. Under the pledge, a handful of companies have promised not to sell student information or target their ads based on students’ behavior. Companies will also only use data for specific educational purposes and will impose limits on how long that information is held. A week after California enacted a landmark law restricting the ways education technology companies can use the information they collect about elementary through high school students, a group of leading industry players is pledging to adopt similar data protections nationwide. The 14 companies include: Microsoft; Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, the educational publishing house; Amplify, a developer of digital curriculums; and Edmodo, an online network for schools that allows teachers to assign homework and measure students’ progress. The pledge was developed by the Future of Privacy Forum, a think tank in Washington, in collaboration with the Software & Information Industry Association, a trade group.
Tracy Mitrano, Inside Higher Ed, Tuesday, October 07, 2014
Google is not among the companies to sign the pledge, and that is no surprise. Anything that would challenge its business model, bring scrutiny to its algorithm, and openly admit that is continues to use data mining from enterprise contracts to improve its services is off corporate limits. The distinction lies here: the signatory companies are NOT advertising companies. They offer content and services that do not rely on data mining as the principle means to fuel their business model.
Karin Matussek, Bloomberg, Tuesday, September 30, 2014
Wednesday, September 17, 2014
Surveys of nearly 5,500 parents in 11 countries around the world, including Europe, Asia and North America, show that parents have high hopes for the contribution that Internet applications can make to their children’s education, especially when it comes to acquiring skills relevant to the modern global economy. At the same time, the vast majority of parents worry that internet companies are tracking and profiling their children’s online activities at school for advertising purposes, and they want such practices banned. Specifically, parents want stronger government regulations against online data mining in schools that isn’t directly related to improving academic performance, and they want schools to forbid such practices. The findings are based on a series of surveys conducted between 2012 and 2014 for SafeGov aimed at capturing global parents’ views on the benefits and risks of proliferating in-school access to internet applications such as email, document creation and group collaboration.
Steven Musil, CNET, Monday, September 15, 2014
"Our business is not based on having information about you. You're not our product," Cook said. "Our products are these, and this watch, and Macs and so forth. And so we run a very different company. I think everyone has to ask, how do companies make their money? Follow the money. And if they're making money mainly by collecting gobs of personal data, I think you have a right to be worried. And you should really understand what's happening to that data, and the companies -- I think -- should be very transparent."