Tracy Mitrano, Inside Higher Ed, Tuesday, January 20, 2015
On Friday, we learned that Google quietly signed the Student Privacy Pledge – almost a week after President Obama called them out by name to ask why not. That is a good thing. Why did it take so long? Hubris first. Google thinks itself above association with other companies when such association is not intrinsically within its business interest. Joining the Pledge when it was first announced three months ago would have seemed unseemly.
Stephen Cobb, WeLiveSecurity Blog, Tuesday, January 20, 2015
I am not under any illusions in laying out these steps. Taking them will be hard and not everyone will agree with them, particularly when moving from the general approach described here to the specifics of implementation. But I do believe now is the time to push this agenda, before the erosion of trust in networking technology undermines its effectiveness and we start to lose the benefits of its deployment. And so that we’re clear, when I say now is the time, I mean now is the time to actually do something instead of just talking about it. Let’s be honest, the right time has come and gone many times in the past without sufficient action being taken, but we can address that lack of commitment elsewhere. Here is what we need to do now...
Kevin Desouza and Gregory Dawson, Brookings, Tuesday, January 20, 2015
Cloud computing is far more than just a simple technology change and requires a close examination of governance, sourcing, and security. We sought to understand how well state government is prepared to address the challenges of cloud computing.
Safety, Privacy, and the Internet Paradox: Solutions at Hand and the Need for new Trans-Atlantic Rules
Microsoft Europe, Tuesday, January 20, 2015
Today at the Center for European Policy Studies, Brad Smith, general counsel and executive vice president, legal and corporate affairs, Microsoft, delivered remarks and participated in a panel discussion on the subject of Trust, data and national sovereignty: solutions for a connected world.
Sean Cavanagh and Michele Molnar, Education Week, Tuesday, January 20, 2015
After initially declining to sign up, technology giant Google has joined a growing number of companies committing to a "student privacy pledge" created by advocacy groups and endorsed by the White House. Google has come under heavy scrutiny for privacy practices that critics have feared would open the door to students' personal information being used for advertising purposes, and the company has revised its policies in the face of those questions. The privacy pledge is being sponsored by the Future of Privacy Forum, a Washington-based think tank that advocates for responsible data use, and the Software & Information Industry Association, a leading trade association, also headquartered in the nation's capital.
Michelle Quinn, San Jose Mercury News, Tuesday, January 20, 2015
Google has anointed itself technology's sheriff, rattling other firms' software doors and windows to see if there are any openings for crooks. And if the Internet giant finds a vulnerability, it notifies the firm: Make a fix within 90 days or we'll expose the flaw to the public. "You should be able to use the Web without fear that a criminal or state-sponsored actor is exploiting software bugs to infect your computer, steal secrets or monitor your communications," Google said in a blog post last year announcing Project Zero, its security team on the lookout for software bugs. Sounds great. But is it?
Aaron Boyd, Federal Times, Monday, January 19, 2015
"I think there is some genuine, real excitement about going to the cloud in the DoD," said Gregory Garcia, executive director of the Army Information Technology Agency. Initial forays into the cloud are likely to be uncoordinated and small in scale. Once the cloud concept proves successful with those early endeavors, more ambitious enterprise-scale projects will likely follow, experts like Garcia say. "As we build success stories of those early adopters, we'll see more people embrace that idea," Garcia said. "Five years from now, I think it's going to be all in the cloud."
Sean Michael, WinBeta, Monday, January 19, 2015
The battle of big business versus big government is being fought among the clouds or at least among Microsoft’s international cloud servers. Microsoft’s director of cyber security and cloud strategy has shared a post titled ‘Privacy considerations in a cloudy world.’ The post highlights points regarding Microsoft’s cyber security made by their Chief Privacy Officer in a video (embedded below). Microsoft is amidst a battle with the government when it comes to protecting their user’s data. One of the key points was that “Microsoft does not provide any government with direct, unfettered access to customers’ data.” There’s a gray area when it comes to who has authority over data stored by Microsoft.
Friday, January 16, 2015
I have been fortunate to work with a number of young innovators lately. They ask me questions about things that are a blast to discuss. How do I reach my maximum potential market? What is the right price point for my device, and so on? The one thing I’ve noticed is that they aren’t concerned about the IP they have created. Recently, SafeGov posted a link to a WSJ article written by Michael Chertoff talking about the need for a rule of law protecting information. It got me thinking about the questions the young innovators have been asking me concerning what they are building.
Mary Madden, Pew Research Center, Friday, January 16, 2015
Pew Research Center has been studying Americans’ attitudes about their own personal information security and that of their families for years. Here are a few highlights: 91% of American adults say that consumers have lost control over how personal information is collected and used by companies. Americans express a broad loss of control over the way their personal data are managed by companies. Fully 91% of adults “agree” or “strongly agree” that “consumers have lost control over how personal information is collected and used by companies.” This includes 45% who “strongly agree” and 46% who “agree” that consumers have lost control.